Tamara Zidansek vs Amina Anshba Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 25 Sep at 12:16 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Zidansek vs A. Anshba

SLO
2
Win
Played
0
Win

RUS
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Zidansek 2 - 0 Anshba
They have played 4 sets in total, with Tamara Zidansek winning 4 and Amina Anshba winning 0. The last match between Tamara Zidansek and Amina Anshba was at the W100 Lisboa, 25-09-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Tamara Zidansek getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Zidansek | 2 |
| Anshba | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R2) W100 Lisboa(09-25-25)
(SF) Telavi(06-29-15)
T. Zidansek vs A. Anshba H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $2,033,811 | Career Prize Money | $8,220 |
| 63.73% (383-218) | Career Total W/L | 56.44% (276-213) |
| 2 | Clay | 0 |
| 22 | Titles | 5 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Zidansek vs A. Anshba Match Preview:
- In recent performances over six months, Tamara Zidansek slightly edges Amina Anshba in second serve points won, achieving 40.30% compared to Anshba's 39.84%. Could this small advantage influence the upcoming match?
- Considering return game statistics, Zidansek again holds a minimal advantage over Anshba on opponents' second serve points, winning 52.27% versus 52.23%, and further outpaces Anshba on first serve returns with 36.45% to 34.00%.
- When facing breakpoints, Anshba displays resilience, saving 47.47% compared to Zidansek's 44.19%. How crucial will this prove during pressure moments in the match?
- A comparative look at wins over the last year reveals Zidansek ahead with a 58.93% win rate, while Anshba holds a 51.43% win rate.
- Both players excel on clay courts. However, Zidansek has a higher career win percentage on clay at 72% compared to Anshba's 60%.
- Zidansek has demonstrated superior performance in high-stakes Challengers/ITF tournaments with a 62.79% win rate, surpassing Anshba's 51.43%.
- Head-to-head, Zidansek has triumphed in their previous encounter 2-0 in sets, suggesting a psychological upper hand.
- Analyzing opponent quality over the past year, Zidansek has consistently faced tougher players, with opponents averaging a higher rank of 224.13 versus Anshba's 331.66.
- In deciding sets, Anshba narrowly surpasses Zidansek with a 50% win rate, potentially providing her with a slight mental and tactical edge if the match extends to that point.
Editorial Prediction (September 25, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Tamara Zidansek and Amina Anshba presents a fascinating clash of skills and strategies.
Zidansek possesses a slight statistical edge in several areas, including second serve points, return game effectiveness, and overall performance on the clay surface. Her past victory over Anshba also provides her with a psychological advantage.
While Anshba shows strengths in saving breakpoints and deciding set performances, her overall record and experience against lower-ranked opponents might play against her.
Given the comprehensive analysis of recent form, head-to-head results, and player capabilities, Tamara Zidansek is likely to claim victory in this upcoming match.
Tamara Zidansek vs Amina Anshba Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Zidansek vs A. Anshba H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 25 | Games Won | 12 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 0:49:20 | Average Match Time | 0:49:20 |
| 60% (36/60) | 1st Serve % | 71% (47/66) |
| 67% (24/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 49% (23/47) |
| 50% (12/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 26% (5/19) |
| 58% (7/12) | Break Pts Won % | 44% (4/9) |
| 58% (38/66) | Return Points Win % | 40% (24/60) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Zidansek Recent Matches Played
A. Anshba Recent Matches Played

T. Zidansek vs A. Anshba Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.73% (383/218) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.44% (276/213) |
| 60.96% (848/543) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.55% (616/493) |
| 54.18% (6958/5884) | Games Win/Loss | 53.09% (5306/4688) |
| 53.01% (88/78) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.22% (42/40) |
| 71.70% (266/105) | Clay Win/Loss | 59.27% (227/156) |
| 48.84% (21/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 29.17% (7/17) |
| 38.10% (8/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 521 | Aces Total | 227 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 1670 | Total Double Faults | 704 |
| 1:28:9 | Average Match Time | 1:38:37 |
| 430.36 | Average Opponent Rank | 518.96 |
| 66% (24624/37396) | 1st Serve % | 72% (20266/28117) |
| 60% (14780/24624) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (11235/20266) |
| 46% (5831/12776) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (3502/7852) |
| 49% (2446/4996) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (2026/3961) |
| 48% (17642/37115) | Return Points Win % | 49% (13895/28245) |
| 48.44% (31/33) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43.33% (13/17) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47.37% (9/10) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52.76% (67/60) | Main Tour W/L | 23.53% (4/13) |
| 70.41% (207/87) | Challenger W/L | 50.87% (176/170) |
| 83.58% (56/11) | Futures W/L | 76.19% (96/30) |
| 64% (379/589) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (274/487) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 64% (83/129) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (38/79) |
| 57% (112/195) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (67/133) |
| 88% (355/312) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (283/251) |
| 11% (355/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (283/32) |
| 29% (246/71) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (206/25) |